Certain Communications or Computing Devices and Components Thereof, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-925: Enterprise Systems Technologies v. Samsung Electronics, et al.

Hired as interpreter for deposition of Samsung employees for 2 days in San Francisco.

Certain Communications or Computing Devices and Components Thereof, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-925: LG Electronics Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., and LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc.

Hired as interpreter for deposition prep and as check interpreter for 10 days of depositions in Seoul, Korea.

E-Watch, Inc. and E-Watch Corporation v. LG Electronics, Inc.

Provided interpretation for deposition of LG Electronics witnesses in Seoul, Korea.

Curocom Energy LLC v. Woolim Resources, et al. – Hired as principal interpreter for trial and depositions.

Provided 11 days of trial interpretation in Houston, TX and over 200 pages of certified translation.

Exxon Mobile et al. v. Southern California Bulk Sale Litigation.

Provided interpretation for 5 days of deposition held in Los Angeles.

Softview v. Apple Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, Dell Inc, HTC Corp, Samsung Electronics, LG Electronics, et.al. – Patent Infringement on mobile web browser features– Hired as principal Korean interpreter for the case.

Provided interpretation for 2 days of deposition in Suwon, Korea, 2 days in Chicago, and 1 day in Washington D.C.

Apple vs. Samsung Patent infringement case re mobile and tablet– Translated more than 1,500 documents for Samsung.

Extradition of Kyung Joon Kim – A high profile investment embezzlement case

Provided translation reviews of more than 300 pages of documents and translated more than 100 pages of documents for the United States of America. Worked as a primary interpreter for depositions in Los Angeles, California.

Yoon Man Choi v. Hyundae Health Center, Inc., et al.

Hired by both parties for trial interpretation for 33 days.

International Reformed University and Seminary v. John Eun Whang aka Eun Young Whang, et al.

Provided interpretation for 5 days of deposition in Los Angeles. Provided certified interpretation for 70 pages of documents.

Innovation Tools S.A. de C.V. et al vs. Turbo Ion Inc. et a.l

Provided certified translation of over 500 pages of evidence and provided interpretation for 5 day of deposition in Los Angeles.

Eden Prayer Mission v. Pensco Trust Company, LLC

Hired by all 3 parties to provide interpretation for 5 days of trial. Provided over 150 pages of certified translation.

Curocom Energy LLC v. Woolim Resources, et al.

Hired as principal interpreter for trial and depositions. Provided 11 days of trial interpretation in Houston, TX and over 200 pages of certified translation.

P.T. Dayup Indo v. IMEX Industries

Provided certified translation of over 180 pages of documents.

Munhwa Broadcasting Corp, et al. v. Doo Hyun Song, et al.

Provided certified translation of over 50 pages of exhibits.

Speedway USA, Inc. v. JP International Air & Sea Corp

Provided interpretation for depositions.

Sotela v. Forever 21

Provided interpretation for 3 days of deposition.

Certified translation of exhibits re: SM Entertainment

Provided 50 pages of certified translation of exhibits.

Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Universal Remote Control, Inc.

Provided trial interpretation for 3 days in Los Angeles and provided certified translation and translation review of 200 pages of documents.

Han v. Han & Brothers, LLC

Provided 3 days of deposition interpretation in Seoul, Korea.

Lee v. New Star Realty

Provided trial interpretation and certified translation of exhibits.

Fitness International – Private Utilities Easement

Provided translation and interpretation services to negotiate private utilities easement with property owner and Fitness International.

Jin Mi Ryung v. TJ Media USA, Inc. and TJ Media Co., Ltd.

Provided certified translation, translation review and verbal translation.

Ju Hun Min, Hyub Choi, et al. v. Joong Ang Daily News

Provided interpretation for 6 days of deposition in Irvine.

Michelle Ju, et al. v. West Bethel Presbyterian Church, et al.

Provided certified translation of 60 pages of documents and interpretation for 5 days of deposition.

Da Hoon Chung v. Jay Yoo, DBA Smart Education

Provided interpretation for 2 days of deposition and 7 days of trial in Los Angeles. Provided certified interpretation of exhibits.

Holy Hill Community Church v. Western California Presbytery

Hired by both parties to provide interpretation for 7 days of trial and certified translations of the exhibits.

Susan Lee v. Sangsin Brake, et al.

Provided interpretation for 3 days of deposition in Los Angeles and provided certified translation of exhibits.

Kumho Tires

Provided certified translation of over 100 pages of documents.

Kim, et al. v. Woonjin Coway USA, Inc.

Provided interpretation for 4 days of deposition in Los Angeles and on conference calls.

Kangjin Choi v. Sung-soo Park, Kyung Mee Park, Hepahope Inc., et al.

Provided certified translation of over 80 pages of exhibits.

FTC Decision re: Collusion of Unfair Price-fixing by 4 Ramen Manufacturers and Distributors

Provided certified translation of over 200 pages of document.

Holy Hill Community Church v. LA Sarang Community Church

Hired by both parties for trial interpretation for 5 days.

Western California Presbytery, et al. v. Dong Sub Bang, et al.

Hired as principal translator and interpreter for the case. Provided certified translation of over 300 pages of exhibits and interpretation services for 1 days of deposition and 2 days of trial.

Sung Dae An and Hanna Park v. Fabianna Lee

Provided interpretation for 4 days of deposition.

Ji v. Sung

Hired as principal Korean interpreter for the trial, for 8 days. Provided certified translation and translation review of 50 pages of exhibits.

Hanmi Bank v. Hong

Provided interpretation for 4 days of deposition held in Los Angeles.

Yangson Smith v. Ryang Hong and Julie Hong, et al.

Hired as language expert and provided translations of written declarations, opinions on translation disputes, and expert witness testimony.

Exxon Mobile et al. v. Southern California Bulk Sale Litigation

Provided interpretation for 5 days of deposition held in Los Angeles.

Softview v. Apple Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, Dell Inc, HTC Corp, Samsung Electronics, LG Electronics, et.al.

Patent Infringement on mobile web browser features– Hired as principal Korean interpreter for the case. Provided interpretation for 2 days of deposition in Suwon, Korea, 2 days in Chicago, and 1 day in Washington D.C.

Bonoble USA v. Daesang Corp.

Hired as principal interpreter for 8 day arbitration and provided over 250 pages of translation of exhibit, including Korean judgments and declarations.

The Oriental Mission Church v. Hyung Jim

Hired as language expert and provided translations of written declarations, opinions on translation disputes, and expert witness testimony.

Artcite LLC v. 2700 Wilshire, LLC et.al.

Provided certified translation of over 200 pages of purchase, sales, and ownership agreements.

Apple vs. Samsung Patent Infringement Case – Re: Mobile and Tablet

Translated more than 1,500 documents for Samsung.

ITRI (Industrial Technology Research Institute) vs. LG Display and LG Electronics et. al. – Patent Infringement Case

Initially hired as the check interpreter and was involved in prepping the witness for the defendants. However on the day of the deposition, both parties agreed to use me as the primary interpreter.

U.S.A. vs. AU Optronics Corporation et. al. – Antitrust case, Re: TFT-LCD (Thinfilm Transistor-Liquid Crystal Display)

Hired as the language expert for the Department of Justice provided translation of more than 350 pages and reviewed more than 200 pages of translation from the defense side. Defended the translation as a language expert whenever there was an issue regarding translation.

LG Electronics Co., Ltd. vs. ASKO and Daewoo et. al. – Patent Infringement case, Re: Direct Drive technology

Provided interpretation for deposition preparations for six deponents and served as a Check Interpreter at 7 depositions. Traveled to Seoul and Changwon, Korea.

Trinity Glass International, Right Concept Inc. vs. LG Chemical and LG America et. al. – Product Liability, Re: Engineered Plastics

Provided interpretation for more than 30 depositions as the official interpreter for both plaintiff and defendant. Provided certified translations and review for more than 400 pages of documents. Traveled to Korea (Seoul and Changwon), Seattle, and San Diego.

Click Entertainment vs. JYP Entertainment, JTune Entertainment, Ji Hoon Jung (Rain) et. al.

Breach of Entertainment Contract involving an international artist – Provided certified translations for more than 100 pages of documents, provided interpretations for witness preparations and worked as a check interpreter for depositions in Seoul, Korea and trial in Honolulu, Hawaii.

Department of Justice antitrust investigation of air cargo price irregularities of Asiana Airline Antitrust

Provided certified translations for over 40 page of documents, reviewed over 300 translated documents and provided interpretations for witness interviews in Los Angeles, California.

Positive Technologies Inc. vs. LG Phillips LCD Co., Ltd et. al. – Patent Infringement Case

Provided certified translations for over 30 pages of documents and provided interpretations for witness preparations and depositions in Seoul, Korea.

Rain Corporation vs. Ji Hoon Jung aka “Rain” et. al. – Trademark Infringement

Provided interpretations for witness preparations and worked as a check interpreter at depositions in Seoul, Korea.

L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. v. Samsung America, Inc. et. al. – Copyright Infringement involving textile print

Provided interpretations for witness testimonies at trial in Los Angeles, California.

Kyung Joon Kim vs. United States of America – Forfeiture / Penalty Case

Provided translations and translation reviews of over 300 pages of documents.

DAS vs. Kyung Joon Kim – Breach of Contract

Provided interpretations for witness preparations and depositions in Los Angeles, California.

Extradition of Kyung Joon Kim – A high profile investment embezzlement case

Provided translation reviews of more than 300 pages of documents and translated more than 100 pages of documents for the United States of America. Worked as a primary interpreter for depositions in Los Angeles, California.

In Re: Trigem America Corporation – Bankruptcy Matter

Provided translations of over 70 pages of Corporate Reorganization Plan of the First and the Second Phase. Provided interpretations at hearings and trial in Los Angeles, California.

United States vs. ROYA RAHMANI, et. al. – A high profile international terrorist Investigation

Provided translation reviews of more than 2,000 pages of documents and provided certified translations of more than 400 pages of documents.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd vs. Renesas Technology et. al. – Patent Infringement Case

Provided interpretations for witness preparations and worked as a primary interpreter for depositions in Washington D.C.

Hitachi Global Storage Technologies Netherlands, B.V. vs. Samsung Electronics Company Ltd et. al. – Patent Infringement Case

Provided interpretations for witness preparations and worked as a primary interpreter for depositions in San Francisco, California.

Ericsson Inc. et . al. vs. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et. al. – Patent Infringement Case

Provided interpretations for witness preparations, and worked as a primary interpreter for depositions in San Francisco, California.

Samsung SDI Co. vs. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd et. al. – Patent Infringement Case

Provided interpretations for witness preparations and worked as a check interpreter for depositions in Washington D.C.

Hitachi Global Storage Technologies Netherlands, B.V. vs. Samsung Electronics Company Ltd et. al – Patent Infringement Case

Provided interpretations for witness preparations and worked as a check interpreter for depositions in San Francisco, California.

Woongjin Coway vs. Wellbeing Station – Breach of Contract

Provided certified translations for over 30 pages of documents and provided interpretations for witness preparations, depositions and trial in Los Angeles, California.

Mira Kim v. Gina Kim, et al., a commercial litigation and business dispute case in the Superior Court of California, County of Orange involving breach of contract claims.

Ko & Martin provided certified legal translation services and supported Bird Marella LLP with Korean-English deposition interpretation for two full-day witness depositions in Santa Ana, California.

In the Matter of Certain Icemaking Machines and Components Thereof, a commercial intellectual property investigation before the U.S. International Trade Commission involving patent infringement claims related to icemaking machines and components thereof.

Ko & Martin supported Morgan Lewis, serving as Check Interpreter and subsequently as Primary Korean Deposition Interpreter in a U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) patent infringement investigation. Also served as Lead Korean Trial Interpreter during three full days of trial proceedings in Washington, D.C.

Estate of Jin Ho Suh, a probate case in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles involving the administration of a decedent's estate.

Ko & Martin supported The Law Offices of Ernest J. Kim, providing seven full days of Korean deposition interpretation for probate proceedings in Rowland Heights and Tustin, California.

TDS v. Anymex, a commercial business dispute involving Korean-English business interpretation services.

Ko & Martin supported Hayes Litigation by providing Korean interpretation for conference calls in a commercial dispute.

Headwater Research LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al., a patent infringement case in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involving wireless communication technologies in mobile devices.

Ko & Martin supported Russ August & Kabat, providing certified Korean legal translation of more than 100 pages and two full days of remote Korean deposition interpretation in a patent infringement matter.

Headwater Research LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al., a patent infringement case in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involving semiconductor and electronic technologies.

Ko & Martin supported Russ August & Kabat with remote Korean-English deposition interpretation for a semiconductor patent infringement dispute conducted via Zoom.

Matthew Sungryong Park v. Seoul Trading Inc., et al., an employment litigation case in the California Superior Court involving employment discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims.

Ko & Martin provided certified legal translation services and supported The Law Office of Briana Kim with Korean deposition interpretation in Long Beach, California.

SC&P Resources, Inc. v. Hermes Capital, Inc., et al., a California Superior Court civil action involving an alleged breach of contract and related claims arising from a loan transaction.

Ko & Martin supported Park LLP as Korean Trial Interpreter during trial proceedings at Stanley Mosk Courthouse in Los Angeles.

TEX-V CO., LTD. v. SHEIN US SERVICES, LLC, et al., a copyright infringement case in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California involving the unauthorized use of copyrighted materials in online retail operations.

Ko & Martin supported Doniger Burroughs, providing Korean legal interpretation for conference calls and Check Interpretation for deposition proceedings via Zoom.

Netlist, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al., a patent infringement case in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involving patented memory technologies.

Ko & Martin supported Irell & Manella LLP as Korean Check Interpreter and Certified Legal Translator, providing certified legal translation of more than 100 pages and Check Interpretation during two full-day deposition proceedings via Zoom.

PARK CONSTRUCTION v. SANG & SANG, a construction and contract litigation case in the Los Angeles County Superior Court involving construction contract disputes.

Ko & Martin supported Parker Shaffie LLP as Korean Deposition Interpreter during deposition proceedings in Los Angeles, California.

Ji et al. v. Naver Corporation et al., a privacy litigation case in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California involving alleged data collection practices related to mobile applications.

Ko & Martin supported Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP as Korean Deposition Interpreter and Certified Legal Translator, providing certified legal translation of more than 180 pages and remote and on-site deposition interpretation in San Diego, California.

Wireless Alliance, LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC, et al., a patent infringement case in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involving 4G and 5G wireless communication technologies.

Ko & Martin supported Russ August & Kabat, serving as Certified Legal Translator. Provided certified legal translation of more than 130 pages of legal and technical documents.

Kang et al. v. Cuckoo Rental America, Inc., an employment litigation case in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles involving alleged wage and hour violations, wrongful discharge, and related employment claims.

Ko & Martin supported JUNG LAW, P.C., serving as Korean Deposition Interpreter and providing half-day Korean-English deposition interpretation via Zoom.

SNC Engineering, Inc. v. Sang Engineering USA, Inc., a business dispute case in the Superior Court of California, County of Orange involving alleged fraud, unlawful business practices, and breach of contract claims.

Ko & Martin supported Ardent Law Group, PC with Korean deposition interpretation via Zoom.

Magna-D Global Healthcare No. 1 Private Equity Fund v. Coimmune, Inc., a corporate governance dispute in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware involving stockholder rights, enforcement of a shareholders' agreement, and related corporate governance issues.

Ko & Martin supported DLA Piper LLP with Korean trial interpretation in Wilmington, Delaware.

Innoarc v. Josh C. Kim et al., a business dispute case in the Superior Court of California, County of Orange involving breach of contract, misrepresentation, fraud, and related claims arising from a construction and signage agreement.

Ko & Martin supported Huffine Chung LLP with Korean trial interpretation in Westminster, California

CogniPower LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al., a patent infringement case in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involving power conversion and power management technologies.

Ko & Martin supported Irell & Manella LLP with Korean interpretation for eight depositions conducted via Zoom.

Yeo Bai Lee v. Christy Jihee Ryoo, et al., a civil dispute case in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara involving breach of contract, fraud, and financial elder abuse claims.

Ko & Martin supported Keller Anderle Scolnick LLP with Korean deposition interpretation via Zoom.

LG H&H Co., Ltd. v. Insil Kim and Sunna Kim, an arbitration under the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Rules involving a contractual dispute concerning a call option and equity valuation.

Ko & Martin supported Russ August & Kabat with Korean interpretation for arbitration preparation and four full days of arbitration hearings in Los Angeles.

Cerence Operating Company v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., a commercial intellectual property dispute in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involving alleged patent-related claims.

Ko & Martin supported Russ August & Kabat, providing certified legal translation of more than 100 pages and Korean interpretation across six depositions conducted via Zoom.

Julie Park et al. v. NMSI INC., et al., an employment dispute in the Superior Court of California involving wage-and-hour claims and related relief under applicable law.

Ko & Martin supported Kingfisher Law APC with Korean deposition interpretation via Zoom and on-site Korean interpretation in Los Angeles, California.

Galaxia Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Luxmax, U.S.A. et al., a commercial dispute in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California involving alleged breach of contract and related claims arising from a distribution dispute.

Ko & Martin supported Bird Marella LLP, providing certified legal translation of more than 80 pages of legal documents.

Duke Park v. Lee Soo Ahn, Bok Hyun Eum, Chelsea Eom, Hong Jun Eum, Soyeon Eum a/k/a So Yon Eum, et al., a business ownership dispute in the District Court of Clark County, Nevada involving alleged fraud and disputed ownership of business entities and real property.

Ko & Martin supported Bird Marella LLP with Korean deposition interpretation via Zoom and four full days of Korean trial interpretation in Las Vegas, Nevada.

SK nexilis Co., Ltd. v. Solus Advanced Materials Co., Ltd. et al., a patent infringement case in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involving battery materials technology.

Ko & Martin supported Quinn Emanuel as Korean Deposition Interpreter and Check Interpreter, providing four full days of deposition preparation and six full days of deposition interpretation in Redwood City, California, four full days of deposition interpretation in Washington, one full day of remote interpretation via Zoom, and three full days of Check Interpretation in Redwood City, California.

Sheridan Bowman v. LG Electronics USA, Inc., an employment dispute in the Superior Court of California, San Luis Obispo County involving alleged religious discrimination, retaliation, and wrongful termination.

Ko & Martin supported Littler Mendelson P.C. with Korean deposition interpretation via Zoom.

Invictus Globe, LLC v. CJ Logistics Holdings America, a business dispute in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York involving alleged claims arising from the parties' business relationship.

Ko & Martin supported DLA Piper with three full days of Korean deposition interpretation via Zoom.

Sinotechnix LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al., a patent infringement case in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

Ko & Martin supported Nelson Bumgardner Conroy PC with Korean deposition interpretation via Zoom.

Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLC v. Cellco Partnership, et al., a patent infringement case in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involving telecommunications technology.

Ko & Martin supported Susman Godfrey LLP with Korean deposition interpretation in Los Angeles, California, and three full days of deposition interpretation in Seoul, South Korea.

Young Lee v. Jacqueline Miranda, et al., a personal injury lawsuit in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles arising from an automobile accident.

Ko & Martin supported California Lawyers Group, Inc. with Korean deposition interpretation via Zoom.

Seonik Cho v. Duke Park, et al., a business and investment dispute in the District Court of Clark County, Nevada involving investment-related financial and contractual claims.

Ko & Martin supported Bird Marella LLP with Korean interpretation for deposition proceedings conducted via Zoom.

Bank of Hope v. Sean Doe, a financial and banking dispute in the United States District Court for the Central District of California arising out of alleged default and related claims.

Ko & Martin served as Korean Deposition Interpreter, providing two full days of interpretation in Duluth, Georgia, and deposition interpretation in Los Angeles, California. Law firms involved: Sheppard Mullin and K&L Gates LLP.

In re: Kia Hyundai Vehicle Theft Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation, a multidistrict litigation in the United States District Court for the Central District of California involving alleged vehicle design defects and products liability claims.

Ko & Martin supported Keller Rohrback LLP, providing certified legal translation of more than 500 pages of legal documents and three full days of Korean deposition interpretation in Seoul, South Korea.

DivX, LLC v. Telechips Inc., a technology licensing dispute in the Superior Court of California, San Diego County involving DivX technology.

Ko & Martin supported Kendall Brill & Kelly LLP, providing certified legal translation of more than 100 pages of legal documents and Korean interpretation for deposition proceedings in San Diego and Los Angeles, California. Ko & Martin also supported Bergeson LLP with Korean interpretation for deposition proceedings in Los Angeles, California.

IMEX TRANSPORT, INC. v. TPO, LLC, David Wick, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, a business dispute in the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego involving alleged breaches of contractual obligations.

Ko & Martin supported Lewis Brisbois with Korean legal interpretation for videoconferences and Korean Check Interpretation for deposition proceedings conducted via Zoom.

Jung Park, et al. v. Sofia Sweetheart LLC, et al., a residential property and easement dispute in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles.

Ko & Martin supported Claremont Law Group with Korean interpretation during trial proceedings in Los Angeles, California.

Mijin Kim v. Asia Automotive America & Jay Sin, an employment dispute in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan involving claims of discrimination and retaliation.

Ko & Martin supported Bodman PLC, providing certified legal translation of more than 200 pages of legal documents.